Skip to main content
Case Study

How we 2.6×'d enrolments for an EdTech brand in 4 months

A full breakdown of the paid + organic + CRM plays that moved enrolments from 420/month to 1,100/month on flat budget.

12 Feb 20263 min readBy Niyas MK

One of our long-standing EdTech clients came to us with a classic problem: budgets were flat, intake targets were growing, and the "easy" tactics had stopped working. This is the 4-month breakdown.

Names changed for NDA reasons. Numbers aren't.

The starting point

  • ₹42L/month across Google + Meta.
  • 420 enrolments/month on average. CPA ~₹10,000.
  • One primary programme, six secondary programmes.
  • Counsellors converting leads at 18–22% depending on programme.

The business wanted 1,000+ enrolments at the same or lower CPA. No extra budget.

Month 1 — audit + quick wins

The first month is always audit-heavy. Not the kind of audit that produces a 40-slide deck. The kind that finds the 5 things that are leaking money and plugs them.

What we found:

  1. Campaign bloat — 147 active ad sets, most under ₹5k/month spend. We consolidated to 31.
  2. Negative keyword gaps — ₹2.1L/month was being spent on jobs-related queries (people searching for jobs in the industry, not courses).
  3. Attribution wrong — Meta was being credited for leads that were actually organic. CAC looked better than it was.
  4. Counsellor routing broken — 31% of leads went to counsellors mismatched to the programme.

We didn't launch anything new in month 1. Cleanup alone moved CPA to ₹7,400 and lifted enrolments to 510.

Month 2 — creative engine + landing systems

With the account consolidated, we unlocked the creative budget.

  • Rebuilt 7 programme-specific landing pages. Same template, programme-specific hooks, social proof, testimonial videos.
  • Launched a creative sprint: 6 concepts/week across Meta and YouTube, filmed with actual students.
  • Introduced a parent-facing creative variant (crucial for the age group), previously missing.

Landing page conversion rose from 2.1% → 4.8%.

Month 2 close: 720 enrolments at ₹5,850 CPA.

Month 3 — organic + intent capture

With paid stabilised, we turned on SEO. Three plays:

  1. Programmatic landing pages for every "career + programme" intent query (200+ pages).
  2. YouTube explainer series for each programme — 3 videos per programme, short-form + long-form.
  3. Reviews and comparisons on third-party aggregators (Coursera, edX, niche portals) where the audience researches before deciding.

None of these hit peak return until month 5+. But the content started absorbing branded search traffic (which had been leaking to competitors) immediately.

Month 3 close: 890 enrolments at ₹5,100 CPA. 28% of leads were now organic.

Month 4 — CRM + counsellor enablement

The missing piece: even with more leads, counsellors were the bottleneck. We rebuilt:

  • CRM playbook per programme with pre-call context (source, intent, queries researched).
  • WhatsApp cadence for leads who didn't pick up — 3 touches over 48 hours, programme-specific templates.
  • Counsellor scoring — real-time dashboard of who was converting at what rate, calibrated weekly.

Counsellor conversion lifted from 20% → 29%. With more efficient calls, we also increased lead capacity per counsellor.

Month 4 close: 1,100 enrolments at ₹3,820 CPA.

The results

| Metric | Baseline | Month 4 | Change | |--------|----------|---------|--------| | Enrolments / month | 420 | 1,100 | +162% | | Blended CPA | ₹10,000 | ₹3,820 | −62% | | Counsellor conversion | 20% | 29% | +45% | | Organic share of leads | 8% | 38% | +375% |

Same budget. Same brand. Same category. The difference: consolidation, a creative engine, an organic layer, and a counsellor enablement system — sequenced so each one's lift compounded on the last.

What didn't work

Worth saying: we tried two TikTok campaigns that didn't move the needle for this category in month 3. Tried a LinkedIn ABM angle targeting HR decision-makers for the B2B variant — flat. Killed both in 2 weeks.

You only hear about wins in case studies. Every account has losses too. The question is whether the program has the discipline to cut them fast.


If this pattern sounds like yours — flat budget, growing targets, scattered accounts — get a free plan and we'll find your version of the month-1 cleanup.

Share
Keep reading